尼采重估“荷马问题”——或语文学如何向哲学转化

张巍

尼采重估“荷马问题”——或语文学如何向哲学转化

张巍

复旦大学

计量
- 文章访问数: 795
- HTML全文浏览量: 153
- PDF下载量: 472
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-11-19
- 修回日期: 2018-02-27

Nietzsche's Revaluation of the “Homeric Question”—How “Philosophy has become what Philology was”

ZHANG Wei

Fudan University

摘要

摘要: 如同在中国古典研究领域，在西方古典学领域里也存在着"考证"与"义理"的交互关系问题，并具体表现为古典语文学与哲学之间的张力。这一张力被青年时期的尼采推向了极致，本文便以尼采论述的"荷马问题"为例证，将这一问题置于18世纪末古典语文学在德国的兴起以及贯穿19世纪德国古典学的两大潮流——"人文主义"与"历史主义"——的思想史脉络来理解，呈现其中内含的古典语文学与哲学之间的本质性争执，试图阐明"古典语文学"从何种"义理动机"与"价值判断"证得"荷马之道"为"古典主义"，而尼采如何对"荷马问题"进行重估，运用从"古典语文学"转化而来的"哲学"将"荷马之道"推向"前古典世界"（一个涌动着原初的创造力和毁灭力的希腊精神的母腹），从而为20世纪的早期希腊研究开辟了全新的方向。
- “荷马问题” /
- 尼采 /
- 古典语文学 /
- “古典主义” /
- “历史主义”
Abstract: Ever since the foundation of modern "classical scholarship" in late 18th century Germany, there has been a tension between classical philology and philosophy, and this tension was increased by the young philologist Friedrich Nietzsche to an alarming degree, which still compels us to re-think the relationship between the two. Nietzsche's revaluation of the "Homeric Question" is a typical case to show the limits of both "historicism" and "humanism," and how the tension between classical philology and philosophy is inherent in their different approaches to the "Homeric Question." Going behind the "philosophical motives" and the "value judgments" of both "historicism" and "humanism," Nietzsche discovers a vibrant and creative pre-Homeric world, and demonstrates the process by which the spirit of "destructive conflict" is transformed into that of "constructive contest" in Homer. Nietzsche's revaluation of the "Homeric Question" can therefore be seen as a prime example to resolve the tension between classical philology and philosophy.
- “Homeric Question” /
- Nietzsche /
- Classical Philology /
- Humanism /
- Historicism

HTML全文

参考文献(33)

[1]	Arrowsmith, W. "Nietzsche on Classics and Classicists." Arion 2.1(1963):5-18.
[2]	——. "Nietzsche on Classics and Classicists (Part Ⅱ)." Arion 2.2(1963):5-27.
[3]	Bishop, P., ed. Nietzsche and Antiquity:His Reaction and Response to the Classical Tradition (Rochester:Camden House, 2004.)
[4]	彼肖普(P. Bishop)编:《尼采与古代——尼采对古典传统的反应和回答》,田立年译,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2011。
[5]	[Bishop, P., ed. Nietzsche and Antiquity:His Reaction and Response to the Classical Tradition. Translated by TIAN Linian. Shanghai:East China Normal University Press, 2011.]
[6]	Cancik, H. Nietzsches Antike. Vorlesung. Stuttgart:J. B. Metzler, 1995.
[7]	Dodds, E.R. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1951.
[8]	Fowler, R., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[9]	Graziosi, B. Inventing Homer:The Early Reception of Epic. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[10]	Gründer, K., ed. Der Streit um Nietzsches "Geburt der Tragödie." Hildesheim:Georg Olms, 1969.
[11]	Judet de la Combe, P. "Futur d'une philologie nietzschéenne?" in Friedrich Nietzsche. Le cas Homère. Paris:Editions EHESS, 2017, 103-48.
[12]	Morris, I., and Barry Powell, eds. A New Companion to Homer. Leiden:Brill, 2011.
[13]	吕健:《"原始文本"抑或"多元文本"?——〈伊利亚特〉新校本争论回溯》,《文贝:比较文学与比较文化》,2014年第1期,第86-129页。
[14]	[LV Jian, "Urtext or Multi-text:Assessing the Iliad's New Teubner Edition." Cowrie:A Journal of Comparative Literature and Culture, 2014(1):83-129.]
[15]	Nietzsche, Fr. Frühe Schriften, hg. Hans J. Mette, Karl Schlechta & C. Koch. München:C. H. Beck, 1933-1940, fotomechanischer Nachdruck, München:Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1994.
[16]	——. Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe in 15 Bänden, hg. Giogio Colli & Mazzino Montinari. Berlin & New York:Walter de Gruyter, 1988.
[17]	——. Die Geburt der Tragödie. Schriften zur Literatur und Philosophie der Griechen. herausgegeben und erläutert von Manfred Landfester. Frankfurt am Main:Insel Verlag, 1994.
[18]	——. The Pre-Platonic Philosophers. Translated by Greg Whitlock. Urbana and Chicago:University of Illinois Press, 2006.
[19]	尼采:《悲剧的诞生》,孙周兴译,北京:商务印书馆,2012年。
[20]	[Friedrich Nietzsche. Die Geburt der Tragödie. Translated by SUN Zhouxing. Beijing:Commercial Press, 2012.]
[21]	O'Flaherty, J. C., T. F. Seller, and R. M. Helm, eds. Studies in Nietzsche and the Classical Tradition. Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press, 1976.
[22]	奥弗洛赫蒂(J. C. O'Flaherty)等编:《尼采与古典传统》,田立年译,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007年。
[23]	[O'Flaherty, J. C., T. F. Seller, and R. M. Helm, eds. Studies in Nietzsche and the Classical Tradition. Translated by TIAN Linian. Shanghai:East China Normal University Press, 2007.]
[24]	Ottmann, H. hrsg. Nietzsche Handbuch. Stuttgart:J. B. Metzler, 2000.
[25]	普法伊费尔:《古典学术史》上卷,刘军译,北京:北京大学出版社,2015年。
[26]	[Rudolf Pfeiffer. History of Classical Scholarship, vol.1. Translated by LIU Jun. Beijing:Peking University Press, 2015.]
[27]	普法伊费尔:《古典学术史》下卷,张弢译,北京:北京大学出版社,2015年。
[28]	[Pfeiffer, Rudolf. History of Classical Scholarship, vol.2. Translated by ZHANG Tao. Beijing:Peking University Press, 2015.]
[29]	Porter, J. I. Nietzsche and the Philology of the Future. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 2000.
[30]	Reibnitz, B. von. Ein Kommentar zu Friedrich Nietzsche "Die Geburt der Tragödie aus dem Geiste der Musik" (Kapitel 1-12). Stuttgart:J. B. Metzler, 1992.
[31]	Silk, M. S., and P. J. Stern. Nietzsche on Tragedy. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1981.
[32]	Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. Erinnerungen 1848-1914. Leipzig:Koehler, 1928.
[33]	Wolf, F. A. Prolegomena to Homer, 1795. Translated with introduction and notes by A. Grafton, G. W. Most and J. E. G. Zetzel. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1985.