从京剧《赵氏孤儿》说开去：中国人忠诚观考察

郑国和

doi:10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20203401

从京剧《赵氏孤儿》说开去：中国人忠诚观考察

doi: 10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20203401

郑国和^,

波尔州立大学

详细信息

作者简介:
郑国和,俄亥俄州立大学日本文学博士,美国印第安纳州波尔州立大学日语教授,2014—2016任该校外语系系主任。主要从事现代日本文学戏剧研究。著有《柴四朗〈佳人奇遇〉研究》,中日文论文《话剧〈女人的一生〉在中国的上演与中日戏剧交流探讨》,《中国的〈忠臣藏〉评价与中国版“日本人论”》,《从平田织佐〈现代口语演剧论〉看原生日语口语教材开发》及英文论文多篇。其英译作品分别被哥伦比亚大学出版社《现代日本文学集》和《现代日本戏剧集》收录。

通讯作者:
郑国和,E-mail:gzheng@bsu.edu

计量
- 文章访问数: 82
- HTML全文浏览量: 7
- PDF下载量: 48
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-08-06
- 修回日期: 2020-09-18

Peking Opera The Orphan of Zhao and Beyond: A Study of the Chinese Ideal of Loyalty

ZHENG Guo-he^,

Ball State University

摘要

摘要: 中国学者中存在着一种相当普遍的观点,认为中国人和日本人的忠诚观截然不同:中国人的“忠”因有“仁”这一天平的裁量因而是相对的,而日本人的“忠”是无“仁”之“忠”因而是绝对的。本文的考察从1959年京剧《赵氏孤儿》出发,旨在检验此观点关于中国人忠诚观的部分是否成立。考察显示,虽然就1959年京剧《赵氏孤儿》而言该观点成立,然而当我们的视野转向历史文献、《赵氏孤儿》舞台的演变、中国著名历史人物忠诚观等诸多方面时,发现该观点不仅不能成立,而且妨碍我们正确认识现代中国历史、政治和文学与忠诚观相互交织激烈碰撞的种种现象及本质,因而是极其有害的。然而该观点最大的问题却是其鼓吹的如下刻板成见:即中国人和日本人的忠诚观扎根于各自的民族性格之中,从来如此,将来也不会改变。从这个意义上说,该观点其实不啻于一个类似“日本人论”的“中国人论”,必须对其加以批判。
- 历史研究方法论 /
- 《忠臣藏》 /
- 中国人忠诚观 /
- 日本人忠诚观 /
- 日本人论 /
- 中国人论
Abstract: It has often been proposed by Chinese scholars that the ideal of loyalty is drastically different in the cultures of Japan and China: while it is relative to the moral virtue of benevolence in China, it is absolute in Japan. This paper examines the validity of this proposal as applied to China. Starting from an analysis of a Peking Opera entitled The Orphan of Zhao, this research indicates that, while the proposal seems valid when applied to the 1959 opera, it collapses when we look beyond that play. Evidence from several sources, including historical records, and the evolving stage of The Orphan of Zhao, shows the proposal to be faulty. Indeed,the proposal is not only faulty, but also prevents us from understanding the dynamics underlying the complicated and often intense interactions of history,literature, and politics in modern China. The most serious problem of the proposal,however, is its advocacy of stereotypical views of Chinese and Japanese cultures reflected in its claim that the different Japanese and Chinese ideals of loyalty are inherent and timeless, existing mysteriously in the national characters of the two peoples. In conclusion, the proposal amounts to a chūgokujinron—a Chinese counterpart of nihonjinron—and must be treated as such.
- Historiography /
- The Orphan of Zhao /
- Chū /
- shingura /
- Chinese ideal of loyalty /
- Japanese ideal of loyalty

HTML全文

参考文献(32)

[1]	LIU Jung-en. Six Yuan Plays Translated with an Introduction. Baltimore:Penguin Books, 1972.
[2]	Lummis, C. Douglas."Ruth Benedict's Obituary for Japanese Culture." Japan Focus:The Asia-Pacific Journal(July, 2007):1-21. Available online at https://apjjf.org/-C.-Douglas-Lummis/2474/article.html,[August 5, 2020].
[3]	Smith, Henry D. II."The Capacity of Chūshingura." Monumenta Nipponica 58, no. 1(Spring, 2003):1-42.
[4]	ZHENG Guohe."Chūshingura and Beyond:A Study of the Japanese Ideal of Loyalty." In Text&Presentation2006:The Comparative Drama Conference Series. Edited by Stratos E. Constantinidis. Jefferson, Northcarolina and London:Mc Farland&Company, 2007, 195-207.
[5]	阿英:《元人杂剧史》,《剧本》1954年,第4-9页.[AYING."Yuanren zaju shi"(A History of Yuan Drama). Juben(Drama Scripts)(1954):4-9. ]
[6]	常金仓,李孟存:《晋国史纲要》,太原:山西人民出版社, 1988年。[CHANG Jinchang and LI Mengcun. Jinguo shi gangyao(An Outline of the History of the State of Jin). Taiyuan:Shanxi People's Press, 1988.]
[7]	董亭:《〈赵氏孤儿〉故事流变过程简述》,《现代语文》2013年第8期,第14-17页。[DONG Ting."Zhaoshi guer gushi liubian guocheng jianshu"(A Brief Account of the Origin and Development of the Tale of the Orphan of Zhao). Xiandai yuwen(Modern Chinese Language Arts)8(2013):14 -17.]
[8]	葛淑敏:《"情美"与"善美":中日戏剧传统的异同》,《戏剧》 1995年第2期,第92-98页。[GE Shumin."'Qingmei'yu'shanmei':Zhongri xiju chuantong de yitong"(The Beauty of Passion versus the Beauty of Virtue:Differences between Chinese and Japanese Theatre Traditions). Xiju(Theatre)2(1995):92 -98.]
[9]	古本戏剧丛刊编辑委员会,编:《元刊杂剧三十种·中》,上海:商务印书馆,1958年。[Ancient Drama Series Commission, ed. Yuankan zaju sanshizhong, zhong(Thirty Plays from the Yuan Period).Vol. 2. Shanghai:The Commercial Press, 1958.]
[10]	郭丹、程小青、李彬源译注:《中华经典名著全本全注全译丛书·左传·中》,北京:中华书局,2012年。[GUO Dan, CHENG Xiaoqing and LI Binyuan, trans. and anno. Zhonghua jingdian mingzhu quanben quanzhu quan yi congshu Zuo zhuan, zhong(Chinese Classics Series, with Complete Original Text, Completely Annotated and Translated). Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company, 2012.]
[11]	黄朴民:《真相难觅:〈赵氏孤儿〉背后的历史重构》,《中华读书报》2014年12月17日第13版。[HUANG Pumin."Zhenxiang nanmi:Zhaoshi guer beihou de lishi chonggou"(Searching for Truth:The Reconstruction of History as Seen in the Drama of The Orphan of Zhao). Zhonghua dushu bao(China Reading Weekly),December 17, 2014:13. ]
[12]	(春秋)晋公子:《说"赵盾专权"-〈晋公子读史记〉之〈赵世家〉(二)》,https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/74843645, 2020年8月5日检索。[Jingongzi. Shuo "Zhao Dun zhuanquan"-JingongziduShiji zhi'Zhao shijia' er(My Reading of Shiji, Part II:"Zhao Dun's Encroachment"). Available at https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/74843645, August 5, 2020.]
[13]	-:《说"下宫之难"-〈晋公子读史记〉之《赵世家》(三), https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/78551290, 2020年8月5日检索.[Jingongzi. Shuo "Xiagong zhi nan"-Jingongzidu Shiji zhi'Zhao shijia' san(My Reading of Shiji, Part III:"The Xiagong Disaster"). Available at https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/78551290, August 5, 2020]
[14]	金海曙:《赵氏孤儿》,《剧本》2003年第9期,第2-33页。[JIN Haishu. Zhaoshi guer(The Orphan of Zhao). Juben(Scripts)9(2003):2 -33.]
[15]	(春秋)孔子:《春秋》, http://www.gushufang.com/shishu/chunqiu/40448.html, 2020年8月5日检索。[Confucius, ed. Chunqiu(The Spring and Autumn Annals). Available at http://www.gushufang.com/shishu/chunqiu/40448.html,.]
[16]	李东军:《透过歌舞伎〈忠臣藏〉现象解读日本民族性格》,《日语学习与研究》2005年第1期,第54-58页。[LI Dongjun."Touguo gewuji Zhongchen zang xianxiang jiedu riben minzu xingge"(Reading Japanese National Character through the Kabuki Chūshingura Phenomenon). Riyu xuexi yu yanjiu(Japanese Language Learning and Research)1(2005 ):54-58.]
[17]	李孟存,李尚师:《晋国史》.太原:山西古籍出版社, 1999年。[LI Mengcun and LI Shangshi. Jinguo shi(A History of the State of Jin). Taiyuan:Shanxi Ancient Books Press,1999.]
[18]	李祥林:《〈赵氏孤儿〉的西方改编》,《华夏文化》2003年第4期,第37-39页。[LI Xianglin."'Zhaoshi guer' de Xifang gaibian"(Adaptations of The Orphan of Zhao in the West). Huaxia wenhua(Chinese Literature)4(2003):37 -39.]
[19]	刘瑞:《〈赵氏孤儿〉和〈忠臣藏〉"忠"的比较分析》,《戏剧之家(上半月)》2013年第5期,第158-159页。[LIU Rui."Zhaoshi guer he Zhongchenzang'zhong'de bijiao fenxi"(A Comparative Analysis of the Virtue of Loyalty in The Orphan of Zhao and Chūshingura). Xiju shi jia, shang banyue(The Home of Theatre, First Half of Month)5(2013 ):158-59.]
[20]	孟世平:《"下宫之难"发生原因新探-对〈史记·赵世家〉的文字误读是导致争讼的根本原因》,《晋阳学刊》2013年第6期,第23-29页。[MENG Shiping."'Xiagong zhi nan' fasheng yuanyin xintan-dui Shiji·zhao shijia de wenzi wudu shi daozhi zhengsong de genben yuanyin"(Mis-punctuation and Mis-pronunciation of "Hereditary House of Zhao" Chapter of Shiji Is the Cause of Disputes:A New Approach to the Reason for the "Xiagong Disaster"). Jinyang xuekan(Jinyang Journal)6(2013 ):23-29.]
[21]	莫文沁:《〈赵氏孤儿〉与〈忠臣藏〉忠孝观念的比较研究》,《湖北第二师范学院学报》2016年第9期,第9-12页。[MO Wenqin."Zhaoshi guer yu Zhongchen zang zhongxiao guannian de bijiao yanjiu"(A Comparative Study of Loyalty and Filial Piety in The Orphan of Zhao and Chūshingura). Hubei dier shifanxueyuan xuebao(Journal of Hubei Second Normal University)9(2016 ):9-12.]
[22]	沈毅骅:《〈赵氏孤儿〉源流考》,《温州师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版》2000年第10期,第72-73页。[SHEN Yihua."Zhaoshi guer yuanliu kao"(Investigations on the Origin and Development of Zhao Family' s Orphan). Wenzhou shifan xueyuan xuebao shehui kexue ban(Journal of Wenzhou Teachers College[Social Sciences])10(2000):72 -73.]
[23]	史淳良:《从〈史记·赵世家〉到〈赵氏孤儿〉看历史题材作品创作中改编的艺术》,《孝感师专学报》1985年第2期,第48-53页。[SHI Chunliang."Cong Shiji zhaoshijia dao Zhaoshi guer kan lishi ticai zuopin chuangzuo zhong gaibian de yishu"(From Records of the Grand Historian·The Hereditary House of Zhao to the Tale of the Orphan of Zhao:The Art of Adaptation as Seen in Works on Historical Topics). Xiaogan shizhuan xuebao(Journal of Xiaogan Teachers College)2(1985 ):48-53.]
[24]	(西汉)司马迁:《史记》,北京:中华书局, 2006年。[SIMA Qian. Shiji(Records of the Grand Historian). Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company, 2006.]
[25]	王季思:《全元戏曲》第3卷,北京:人民文学出版社, 1999年。[WANG Jisi. Quan yuan xi qu. Disan juan(Complete Works of Yuan Drama). Vol. 3. Beijing:Peoples' Literature Press, 1999.]
[26]	王雁改编:《赵氏孤儿:北京京剧团演出本》,北京:中国戏剧出版社, 1959年.[WANG Yan, ed. Zhaoshi guer(The Orphan of Zhao). Beijing:Chinese Drama Press, 1959.]
[27]	吴丽娜:《实践理性的政治历史剧-〈赵氏孤儿〉题材剧的文化结构分析》,《戏剧》2004年第1期,第46-49页。[WU Lina."Shijian lixing de zhengzhi lishiju:Zhaoshi guer ticai ju de wenhua jiegou fenxi"(A Practical Rational Political Historical Drama:A Culture Structural Analysis of The Orphan of Zhao). Xiju(Theatre)1(2004):46 -49.]
[28]	岳峰:《〈赵氏孤儿〉与〈哈姆雷特〉》,《盐城师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版》1999年第7期,第3-10页。[YUE Feng."Zhaoshi guer yu Hamuleite"(The Orphan of Zhao and Hamlet). Yancheng shifan xueyuan xuebao zhexue shehui kexue ban(Journal of Yancheng Teachers College:Philosophy and Social Studies Edition)7(1999):3 -10.]
[29]	张哲俊:《悲剧形式:〈赵氏孤儿〉元明刊本的比较》,《文学遗产》2000年2期,第74-85页。[ZHANG Zhejun."Beiju xingshi:Zhaoshi guer Yuanming kanben de bijiao"(The Form of a Tragedy:A Comparative Study of the Yuan Version and the Ming Version of The Orphan of Zhao). Wenxue yichan(Literary Heritage)2(2000):74 -85.]
[30]	郑国和:《中国的〈忠臣藏〉评介与中国版"日本人论"》,《日本学研究》2009年第00期,第245-258页。[ZHENG Guohe."Zhongguo de Zhongchenzang pingjia yu Zhongguoban'Ribenren lun'"(Reception of Chūshingura in China:A Chinese Version of Nihonjinron). Ribenxue yanjiu(Japanese Studies)00(2009 ):245-58.]
[31]	周萍萍,李刚:《中日复仇文学作品比较:以〈赵氏孤儿〉与〈忠臣藏〉为例》,《日本研究》2007年第2期,第83-89页。[ZHOU Pingping and LI Gang."Zhongri fuchou wenxue zuopin bijiao yanjiu, yi Zhaoshi guer yu Zhongchen zang wei li"(A Comparative Study of Chinese and Japanese Revenge Literature with a Focus on The Orphan of Zhao and Chūshingura). Riben yanjiu(Japan Studies)2(2007 ):83-89.]
[32]	周贻白:《中国戏剧发展史》,上海:上海古籍出版社, 1979年。[ZHOU Yibai. Zhongguo xiju fazhan shi(A History of Chinese Drama). Shanghai:Shanghai Ancient Book Press,1979).]