新语文学/世界语文学的方法论启示：中国学术如何融入世界学术？

贾晋华

doi:10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20214102

新语文学/世界语文学的方法论启示：中国学术如何融入世界学术？

doi: 10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20214102

贾晋华^1,2, ,

1. 澳门大学;
2. 扬州大学

详细信息

作者简介:
贾晋华，比较文学博士，澳门大学哲学及宗教学系兼职教授、扬州大学文学院讲座教授，研究方向为中国古代文学、哲学及宗教。

通讯作者:
贾晋华,E-mail:jinhua.jia@polyu.edu.hk

计量
- 文章访问数: 150
- HTML全文浏览量: 61
- PDF下载量: 44
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-12-09
- 修回日期: 2020-10-05

Inspirations from New Philology/World Philology: How Chinese Humanities Integrated with World Humanities

JIA Jin-hua^{1,2
, ,}

1. University of Macao;
2. Yangzhou University

摘要

摘要: 语文学是中西共有的学术传统。在西方,始于公元前3世纪古希腊的语文学源远流长,被誉为现代人文各学科的源头。在中国,涵括文字学、音韵学、训诂学、校勘学、目录学、文献学和考据学的语文学自汉代以来就成为学术的根基,至清代乾嘉学术达到高峰。20世纪初以来,由于现代语言学的兴起及人文学科的分枝散叶,语文学在东西方都衰落了一段时期。但近三四十年来,语文学正在世界范围内呈现复兴和变革的趋势,先后出现各种新语文学,并正在发展成为世界语文学。新语文学/世界语文学强调通过考证和阐释原始文献(文本的和其他载体的)而全面探讨其社会历史背景和语言文化意义,从而有可能将人文各学科重新融会贯通。由于是中西共有的传统方法,新语文学/世界语文学可以抛开无休止的中学西学之争。由于强调考据训诂与分析评论相结合,新语文学/世界语文学的研究方法可以导致既有厚实文献基础、又有深刻义理阐释并遵循国际学术规范的世界一流成果,从而真正融入世界学术。
- 中国学术 /
- 世界学术 /
- 语文学 /
- 新语文学 /
- 世界语文学
Abstract: Philology is the common academic tradition in both China and the West.In the West,philology began in Greece as early as the third century BCE,which has been regarded as the origin of the various modern disciplines of the humanities.In China,philology encompasses paleography,phonology,exegetics,textual studies,bibliography,documentation,and evidential studies.It had been the academic foundation since the Han dynasty and reached a high peak in the Qianlong-Jiaqing scholarship of the Qing dynasty.Since the beginning of the twentieth century,with the rise of modern linguistics and the ramifications of other humanities disciplines,philology has declined in both the West and East.In recent decades,however,philology has presented a tendency of reviving and reforming.Various kinds of new philology have emerged and are developing into world philology.New philology/world philology emphasizes investigating socio-historical contexts and language-cultural implications by studying and interpreting primary literature(either textual or in other media).As a result,this new tendency can reintegrate the various disciplines of the humanities.As the common tradition of China and the West,new philology/world philology can throw away the endless disputes concerning the superiority of Chinese learning or Western learning.Because of its emphasis on the combination of evidential study and analytical research,new philology/world philology as a research approach can lead to greatly improved outcomes of solid documentation,profound interpretation,and international academic standards,eventually integrating Chinese humanities with world humanities.
- Chinese humanities /
- world humanities /
- philology /
- new philology /
- world philology

HTML全文

参考文献(41)

[1]	Cerquiglini, Bernard. In Praise of the Variant:A Critical History of Philology. Translated by Betsy Wing. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
[2]	Chang, Ku-ming Kevin. "Philology or Linguistics? Transcontinental Responses." In World Philology. Edited by Sheldon Pollock, Benjamin A. Elman, and Ku-ming Kevin Chang. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 2015, 311-32.
[3]	Elman, Benjamin. "Early Modern or Late Imperial? The Crisis of Classical Philology in Eighteenth-Century China." In World Philology. Edited by Sheldon Pollock, Benjamin A. Elman, and Ku-ming Kevin Chang. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 2015, 225-44.
[4]	——. From Philosophy to Philology:Intellectual and Social Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China. Cambridge, MA:Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1984.
[5]	Guthenke, Constanze. "'Enthusiasm Dwells Only in Specialization':Classical Philology and Disciplinarity in Nineteenth-Century Germany." In World Philology. Edited by Sheldon Pollock, Benjamin A. Elman, and Ku-ming Kevin Chang. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 2015, 264-84.
[6]	Harper, Donald, and Marc Kalinowski. The Daybook Manuscripts of the Warring States, Qin, and Han. Leiden:Brill, 2017.
[7]	Honey, David B. Incense at the Altar:Pioneering Sinologists and the Development of Classical Chinese Philology. New Haven, CT:American Oriental Society, 2001.
[8]	Lockhart, James. "Charles Gibson and the Ethnohistory of Postconquest Central Mexico." In Nahuas and Spaniards:Postconquest Central Mexican History and Philology. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1991.
[9]	Man, Paul de. "The Return to Philology." In The Resistance to Theory. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 1986, 21-26.
[10]	Nugent, Christopher M. B. Manifest in Words, Written on Paper:Producing and Circulating Poetry in Tang Dynasty China. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Asia Center, 2011.
[11]	Owen, Stephen. "The Manuscript Legacy of the Tang:The Case of Literature." Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 67, no. 2 (2007):295-326.
[12]	Pollock, Sheldon. "Introduction." In World Philology. Edited by Pollock, Benjamin A. Elman, and Ku-ming Kevin Chang. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 2015, 2-3.
[13]	Quenzer, Jörg B. "Introduction." In Manuscript Cultures:Mapping the Field. Edited by Jörg B. Quenzer, Dmitry Bondarev, and Jan-Ulrich Sobisch. Berlin:De Gruyter, 2014, 1-7.
[14]	Restall, Matthew. "A History of the New Philology and the New Philology in History." Latin American Research Review 38, no. 1 (2003):113-34.
[15]	Schafer, Edward H. "What and How is Sinology." T'ang Studies 8-9 (1990-91):23-44.
[16]	Turner, James. Philology:The Forgotten Origins of Modern Humanities. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 2014.
[17]	Ziolkowski, Jan M., ed. On Philology. University Park:Pennsylvania State University Press, 1990.
[18]	(清)戴震(1724-1777)著, 赵玉新点校:《戴震文集》卷十, 北京:中华书局, 1980年。
[19]	DAI Zhen (1724-1777). Daizhen wenji (Collected Writings of Daizhen). Vol. 10. Edited by ZHAO Yuxin. Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company, 1980.
[20]	冯胜君:《出土材料所见先秦古书的载体以及构成和传布方式》, 《出土文献与古文字研究》2001年第4辑, 第195-214 页。
[21]	FENG Shengjun. "Chutu cailiao suojian Xianqin gushu de zaiti yiji goucheng he chuanbo fangshi" (The Media and Composition and Dissemination Methods of Ancient Books in the Pre-Qin Period as Seen in Excavated Materials). Chutu wenxian yu guwenzi yanjiu (Studies on Excavated Texts and Paleography) 4 (2001):195-214.
[22]	(美)夏德安:《出土古代中医写本与科技文献研究、写本文化研究和新语文学》, 见贾晋华、陈伟、王小林、来国龙编:《新语文学与早期中国研究》, 上海:上海人民出版社, 2018年,第81-91页。
[23]	Harper, Donald. Chutu gudai zhongyi xieben yu keji wenxian yanjiu, xieben wenhua yanjiu he xin yuwenxue (Studies on Excavated Ancient Chinese Medicine Manuscripts and Technical Literature, the Manuscript Culture, and New Philology). In Xin yuwenxue yu zaoqi Zhongguo yanjiu (New Philology and Early China Studies). Edited by JIA Jinhua, CHEN Wei, WANG Xiaolin and LAI Guolong. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2018, 81-91.
[24]	贾晋华、白照杰:《导论》, 见《中国宗教研究新视野:新语文学的启示》, 北京:宗教文化出版社, 2020年, 第1-8 页。
[25]	JIA Jinhua and BAI Zhaojie. "Introduction." In Zhonguo zongjiao yanjiu xin shijie:xin yuwenxue de qishi (New Perspectives in Chinese Religious Studies:Inspirations from New Philology). Beijing:China Religious Culture Publisher, 2020, 1-8.
[26]	贾晋华、陈伟、王小林、来国龙:《导论》, 见《新语文学与早期中国研究》, 第1-14 页。
[27]	JIA Jinhua, CHEN wei, WANG Xiaolin, and LAI Guolong. "Introduction." In Xin yuwenxue yu zaoqi Zhongguo yanjiu (New Philology and Early China Studies), 1-14.
[28]	(法)马克:《当代中国的写本文化及其对研究战国后期至秦汉的书写实践和方术类文献的启示》, 见《新语文学与早期中国研究》, 上海:上海人民出版社, 2018年,第116-134页。
[29]	Kalinowski, Marc. "Dangdai Zhongguo de xieben wenhua jiqi dui yanjiu Zhanguo houqi zhi Qin-Han de shuxie shijian he fangshulei wenxian de qishi" (Inspiration of Manuscript Culture in Contemporary China for the Study of Writing Practice and Technical Texts in the Late Warring States to Qin and Han Periods). In Xin yuwenxue yu zaoqi Zhongguo yanjiu (New Philology and Early China Studies). Edited by JIA Jinhua, CHEN Wei, WANG Xiaolin and LAI Guolong. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2018, 116-34.
[30]	来国龙:《通假字、新语文学和出土战国秦汉简帛的研究》, 见贾晋华、陈伟、王小林、来国龙编:《新语文学与早期中国研究》, 上海:上海人民出版社,2018年, 第92-115 页。
[31]	LAI Guolong. "Tongjiazi, xin yuwenxue he chutu Zhanguo Qinhan jianbo de yanjiu "(Study on Phonetic Loan Characters, New Philology, and Excavated Bamboo-Silk Manuscripts of the Warring States, Qin, and Han Periods). In Xin yuwenxue yu zaoqi Zhongguo yanjiu (New Philology and Early China Studies). Edited by JIA Jinhua, CHEN Wei, WANG Xiaolin and LAI Guolong. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2018, 92-115.
[32]	——:《论战国秦汉写本文化中文本的流动与固定》, 《简帛》2007年第2辑, 第515-527页。
[33]	——. "Lun Zhanguo Qin Han xieben wenhua zhong wenben de liudong yu guding" (On Textual Fluidity and Fixity in the Manuscript Culture of the Warring States, Qin, and Han Periods). Jian Bo (Bamboo and Silk) 2 (2007):515-27.
[34]	(美)夏含夷:《〈郑文公问太伯〉与中国古代文献抄写的问题》, 见贾晋华、陈伟、王小林、来国龙编:《新语文学与早期中国研究》, 上海:上海人民出版社, 2018年,第135-140页。
[35]	Shaughnessy, Edward L. "Zheng Wengong wen Taibo yu Zhongguo gudai wenxian chaoxie de wenti" (Zheng Wengong Asking Taibo and Problems of Manuscript Production in Early China). In Xin yuwenxue yu zaoqi Zhongguo yanjiu (New Philology and Early China Studies). Edited by JIA Jinhua, CHEN Wei, WANG Xiaolin and LAI Guolong. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2018, 135-40.
[36]	王涛:《20世纪训诂学学科名称定义的争论》, 《汉学研究通讯》2003年第2期, 第10-17 页。
[37]	WANG Tao. "Ershi shiji xunguxue xueke mingcheng dingyi de zhenglun" (Debate on the Definition and Name of Chinese Exegetics in the 20th Century). Hanxue yanjiu tongxun (Newsletter for Research in Chinese Studies) 2 (2003):10-17.
[38]	余欣:《博望鸣沙:中古写本研究与现代中国学术史之会通》, 上海:上海古籍出版社, 2012年。
[39]	YU Xin. Bowang mingsha:zhonggu xieben yanjiu yu xiandai Zhongguo xueshushi zhi huitong (Facing a New Frontier:Integrated Studies on Medieval Manuscript Culture and Modern Chinese Intellectual History). Shanghai:Shanghai Classics Publishing House, 2012.
[40]	——:《写本时代知识社会史研究:以出土文献所见〈汉书〉的传播与影响为例》, 《唐研究》第13卷(2007), 第463-504页。
[41]	——. "Xieben shidai zhishi shehuishi yanjiu:yi chutu wenxian suojian Hanshu de chuanbo yu yingxiang weili" (Study on the Social History of Knowledge in the Age of Manuscript:Taking the Transmission and Influence of the Han History Seen from Excavated Texts as an Example), Tang yanjiu (Journal of Tang Studies) 13 (2007):463-504.