“观象”“系词”与“神道设教”——文学侨易学视域下的《焦氏易林》之占验与文学问题

李川

doi:10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20214308

“观象”“系词”与“神道设教”——文学侨易学视域下的《焦氏易林》之占验与文学问题

doi: 10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20214308

李川^,

中国社会科学院

详细信息

作者简介:
李川,河北衡水人,文学博士,现任中国社会科学院外国文学研究所副研究员,目前主要从事比较文学、神话学研究。

通讯作者:
李川,E-mail:jtrzjtgjzb@126.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 66
- HTML全文浏览量: 32
- PDF下载量: 37
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-01-08
- 录用日期: 2021-02-10

“Observing the Image,” “Explaining with Language,” and “Setting Up Religion with the Divine Way”: Divination and Literary Problems in Jiao Gong's Forest of Yi from the Perspective of Literary Qiao-Yi

LI Chuan^,

Chinese Academy of Social Sciences

摘要

摘要: 中国现代的文学运动是西方二元论介入的产物，反思现代需要有一个更宏大的理论视野。此种视野至少包含时空两个必要的层次，就空间而言，既然中国文学和域外文学浑然一体，立足于世界文学的全球视野就是必要的；就时间层次上来说，不能不重视古今之争之于当下文学观念反思的意义。而这两个层次，恰恰是侨易学的努力方向。随着传统经学体系的解体，《易林》首先被视为“文学”作品，文学云云就有侨易的因素。《焦氏易林》植根于《周易》“立象以尽意”五项原则基础之上，足证其“象学之集大成”的价值。无论《易》教，还是《诗》教，以及其他经学之教，皆包含华夏文学肇始的源始逻辑。理解了这一源始逻辑，则得以进一步发掘《易林》在当下语境中的价值和意义。就《易林》占验体系而论，其“观象”乃《易经》的传统，其“系词”乃《诗经》的传统，其表达特质是诗性的、直观的而非逻辑的、理性的。从重新调整我们的生活方式、重新思考现代人在宇宙中的位置以应对现代科学主义的危机来论，对《易林》的占验系统予以重审也是必要的。就易学传统内部而言，占卜从来就是支流和末途，而对德性的强调才是经学的核心思想，然《易经》系统对德性的强调乃是基于“视履考祥”“神道设教”的基础之上，这种基础带有某种运命论色彩。
- 侨易学 /
- 文学 /
- 《焦氏易林》 /
- 神道设教
Abstract: Modern Chinese literature is the product of the intervention of Western dualism. There are two levels: time and space. From the perspective of space, it is necessary for Chinese literature and foreign literature to be integrated in the global vision of world literature; from the perspective of time, we should pay attention to the significance of the debate between ancient and modern for the reflection of current literary concepts. These two levels are exactly the direction of Qiao-Yiology studies. With the disintegration of the traditional system of Confucian classics, Jiao Gong's The Forest of Yi was first regarded as a “literary” work, and there were many factors in literature. The Forest of Yi is rooted in the five principles of “setting up images to fulfill the meaning” in Zhouyi, which proves the value of“the integration of iconology.” No matter the teaching of Zhouyi, or the teaching of the Book of Songs, and other Confucian classics, all contain the logic of the origin of Chinese literature. Understanding this logic can further explore the value and significance of The Forest of Yi in the current context. As far as the divination system of The Forest of Yi is concerned, its “observing the image” is the tradition of Zhouyi, its “explaining with language” is the tradition of the Book of Songs, and its expressive characteristics are poetic and intuitive rather than logical and rational. It is also necessary to reexamine the test system of The Forest of Yi from the perspective of readjusting our way of life and rethinking the struggle of modern people in the universe to cope with the crisis of modern scientism. Within the tradition of Yi-ology, divination has always been a branch and an end, and the emphasis on virtue is the core idea of Confucian classics. However, the emphasis on virtue in the Zhouyi is based on the theory of divinity, which is full of fatalism.
- Qiao-Yiology /
- literary /
- The Forest of Yi by Jiao Gong /
- setting up religion with the Divine Way

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	Shaw, Ian.The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt.Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2002.
[2]	陈良运:《"〈易林〉几与〈三百篇〉并为四言诗矩彠"-钱钟书论〈易林〉述评》, 《周易研究》2002年第5期, 第64-71页。[CHEN Liangyun. "Yilin ji yu Sanbaipian bing wei siyanshi juhuo" (Yilin and the Book of Songs Are the Sources of Four Character Poems:Comments on Qian Zhongshu's Research).Zhouyi yanjiu(Studies of Zhouyi) 55, no.5 (Oct.2002 ):64-71.]
[3]	(清)黄宗羲:《易学象数论》, 北京:中华书局, 2010年。[HUANG Zongxi.Yixue xiangshu lun(Comments on the Image and Number of Yi-ology).Beijing:Zhong Hua Book Company, 2010.]
[4]	(日)柄谷行人:《日本现代文学的起源》, 赵京华译, 北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店, 1980年。[KARATANI, Kojin.Riben xiandai wenxue de qiyuan(The Origin of Modern Japanese Literature).Translated by ZHAO Jinghua.Beijng:SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1980.]
[5]	李川:《文化复兴语境下的 "侨易学" 现象》, 《江苏师范大学学报》2016年第4期, 第64-70页。[LI Chuan. "Wenhua fuxing yujing xia de ‘Qiaoyixue’ xianxiang" (On the Phenomenon of Qiao-Yi Theory in the Context of Cultural Renaissance).Jiangsu shifan daxue xuebao(Journal of Jiangsu Normal University) 42, no.4 (Aug.2016 ):64-70.]
[6]	(美)列奥·施特劳斯:《迫害与写作艺术》, 刘峰译, 北京:华夏出版出社, 2012年。[Leo Strauss.Pohai yu xiezuo yishu(Persecution and the Art of Writing).Translated by LIU Feng.Beijing:Huaxia Publishing House, 2012.]
[7]	楼宇烈:《周易注校释》, 北京:中华书局, 2012年。[LOU Yulie.Zhouyi zhu jiaoshi(The Proofreading and Explanation of Zhouyi Annotations).Beijing:Zhong Hua Book Company, 2012.]
[8]	(清)尚秉和:《周易尚氏学》, 北京:中华书局, 2016年。[SHANG Binghe.Zhouyi Shangshi xue(Shang's Yi-ology).Beijing:Zhong Hua Book Company, 2016.]
[9]	——:《焦氏易林注》, 北京:九州出版社, 2010年。[——.Jiaoshi yilin zhu(Annotations on Forest of Yi by Jiao Gong).Beijing:Jiuzhou Publishing House, 2010.]
[10]	王晖:《从甲骨金文与考古资料的比较看汉字起源时代-并论良渚文化组此类陶文与汉字的起源》, 《考古学报》, 2013年第3期, 第283-296页。[WANG Hui. "Cong jiagu jinwen yu kaogu ziliao de bijiao kan hanzi qiyuan shidai-bing lun Liangzhu wenhua zu ci lei taowen yu hanzi de qiyuan" (The Date of the Origination of the Chinese Characters Seen from the Comparison of the Oracle Bone and Bronze Inscription and the Archaeological Materials:Also on the World-Forming Pottery Marks of Liangzhu Culture and the Date of the Chinese Characters).Kaogu xuebao(Acta Archaeologica Sinica) 190, no.3(Jul.2013 ):283-96.]
[11]	(清)王筠:《文字蒙求》, 北京:中华书局, 1962年。[WANG Yun.Wenzi mengqiu(The Enlightenment of Chinese Characters).Beijing:Zhong Hua Book Company, 1962.]
[12]	徐传武、胡真:《易林汇校集注》, 北京:中华书局, 2012年。[XU Chuanwu, HU Zhen.Yilin huijiao jizhu(Proofreading and Annotation of Forest of Yi).Beijing:Zhong Hua Book Company, 2012.]
[13]	徐复、宋文民:《说文五百四十部首正解》, 南京:江苏古籍出版社, 2003年。[XU Fu, SONG Wenming.Shuowen wubaisishibu zhengjie(The Explanation of the 540 Radicals in Shuowen).Nanjing:Jiangsu Classics Publishing House, 2003.]
[14]	叶隽:《文学侨易学与 "观念侨易"-"文学与思想史" 研究的方法论思考》, 《中国比较文学》2017年第2期, 第15-25页。[YE Jun. "Wenxue Qiaoyixue yu ‘guannian Qiaoyi’ "(The Study of Literary Qiao-Yi and "the Idea of Qiao-Yi"-Methodological Thinking on the History of Literature and Thought).Zhongguo bijiaowenxue(Compara-tive Literature in China) 2(2017):15 -25.]
[15]	——:《变创与渐常:侨易学的观念》, 北京:北京大学出版社, 2014年。[——.Bianchuang yu jianchang:Qiaoyixue de guannian(Drastic Change and Gradual Change:The Concept of Qiao-Yiology).Beijing:Beijing University Press, 2014.]
[16]	臧克和、王平:《说文解字新订》, 北京:中华书局, 2002年。[ZANG Kehe, WANG Ping.Shuowenjiezi xinding(A New Revision of Shuowen jiezi).Beijing:Zhong Hua Book Company, 2002.]
[17]	(宋)朱熹:《周易本义》, 北京:中华书局, 2009年。[ZHU Xi.Zhouyi benyi(The Original Meaning of Zhouyi).Beijing:Zhong Hua Book Company, 2009.]