建构总体诗学：巴赫金对话哲学与文学跨学科研究

季明举

doi:10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20236406

建构总体诗学：巴赫金对话哲学与文学跨学科研究

doi: 10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20236406

季明举^,

曲阜师范大学

基金项目:

本文系2022年度国家社会科学基金项目《白银时代的俄罗斯宗教美学研究》（项目编号：22BZX27）的阶段性成果。

详细信息

作者简介:
季明举,曲阜师范大学外国语学院教授,博士生导师,主要研究领域为比较文学与世界文学、俄罗斯美学与文学理论。

通讯作者:
季明举,E-mail:vova0816@sina.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 22
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-02-14
- 录用日期: 2023-11-21

Constructing General Poetics: Interdisciplinary Studies of Literature Based on Bakhtin’s Philosophy of Dialogism

JI Mingju^,

Qufu Normal University

摘要

摘要: 面对当今文学理论日渐“枯竭”的困境,国内外学界对文学研究的跨学科路径表现出越来越浓厚的兴趣,但迄今为止对文学跨学科研究的探讨大多都局限于单一学科界面(文本内场域)的内部关系研究、跨文本内部关系研究、跨学科外部关系研究,以及对文学的学科外研究等方面。巴赫金从强调“我与他者”主体间性及彼此有效互动的对话哲学引申出以“审美事件”为核心的行为美学,并在此理论基础上建构起以艺术与生活、艺术与责任、艺术与话语体裁、艺术与文化为基座的文艺学总体诗学架构。单就文艺学建构来看,巴赫金认为艺术(文学)与生活是本质上完全不同的东西,但基于主体间性的对话性应答(责任)成为沟通二者的桥梁。所以文艺学应当成为摒弃“材料美学”而共时性地探讨“审美事件”新涵义的跨学科平台。文学跨学科研究正是一种集“微型对话”与“大型对话”、共时性(体裁诗学研究)与历时性(历史诗学研究)于一体的动态性综合研究,其中对于艺术领地之文化边界的外位性考察正适合于文化诗学。未来的文艺学理论建构理当成为把握艺术复调和“杂语性”(“双声语”)、艺术形式的布局和样态(体裁-事件)、艺术形式的演变规律(体裁发展史)、以及艺术与文化边界考察的系统性总体诗学,成为集理论(体裁)诗学、历史诗学、文化诗学于一体的跨学科诗学建构。从人文科学跨学科视野出发,巴赫金这一总体性诗学建构和整体性研究方法论打通了哲学、美学和文艺学、文化学研究的人文跨学科通道,对时下成为国内外学术热点的文学跨学科研究构成重大的理论启示。
- 巴赫金 /
- 对话哲学 /
- 审美事件 /
- 总体诗学 /
- 文学跨学科研究
Abstract: In the face of the “exhaustion” of literary theory today, both domestic and global academes have shown increasing interests in the interdisciplinary studies of literature. Current research, however, is mostly limited to the study of the internal relationship of a single subject interface of literary research, the study of inter-text internal relations of literary research, interdisciplinary research on external relations, and cross-disciplinary literary research etc. Bakhtin's philosophy of dialogism derives from behavioral aesthetics that advocates an intersubjectivity of the “I and the Other,” which centers on “aesthetic events” in the context of art and life, art and responsibility, art and discourse genre, and art and culture. Bakhtin believes that art and life are fundamentally different, but response to dialogue(inter-subjective responsibility) bridges the two. Therefore, studies of literature and art should become an interdisciplinary platform to discard “material aesthetics” and explore the new meaning of “aesthetic event” simultaneously. Interdisciplinary studies of literature are precisely dynamic and comprehensive studies that combine “micro-dialogue” and “macro-dialogue,” synchronicity(the study of genre poetics) and historicity(the study of historical poetics), among which the investigation of the cultural boundary of artistic arena is tellingly suitable for the study of cultural poetics. So, the future construction of literary theory should be a systematic and holistic poetics that grasps artistic polyphony and “heteroglossia” (“bilingualism”), the layout and pattern of literary forms(genre-events), the evolution of literary forms(the history of genre development), and the examination of the cultural boundaries in literature and art. An interdisciplinary poetic study ought to integrate three dimensions of artistic and literary studies: theoretical(genre) poetics, historical poetics, and cultural poetics. From an interdisciplinary vision of the humanities studies, Bakhtin's theory of a construction of the poetic whole and his holistic research methodology have opened up the humanistic interdisciplinary channels of philosophy, aesthetics, literary and cultural studies, and constitute a significant theoretical revelation to the interdisciplinary study of art and literature.
- Bakhtin /
- dialogue /
- behavioral aesthetics /
- general poetics /
- literary interdisciplinary research

HTML全文

参考文献(12)

[1]	Prince, Gerald. A Dictionary of Narratology. Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press, 1987.
[2]	Бахтин М.М.Вопросы литературы и эстетики(Questions of Literature and Aesthetics).Moscow:Artistic literature Press,1975.
[3]	(俄)巴赫金:《巴赫金全集,哲学美学》,晓河、贾泽林等译,石家庄:河北教育出版社,1998年。[Bakhtin.Bahejin quanji:zhexuemeixue (The Complete Works of Bakhtin:Philosophical Aesthetics).Translated by Xiaohe,JIA Zelin et al.Shijiazhuang:Hebei Education Press,1998.]
[4]	——:《巴赫金全集,周边集》,李辉凡、张捷等译,石家庄:河北教育出版社,1998年。[——.Bahejin quanji:zhoubian ji (The Complete Works of Bakhtin:Periphery Collection).Translated by LIHuifan and ZHANG Jie.Shijiazhuang:Hebei Education Press,1998.]
[5]	——:《巴赫金全集,文本对话与人文》,白春仁、晓河等译,石家庄:河北教育出版社,1998年。[——.Bahejin quanji:wenben duihua yu renwen (The Complete Works of Bakhtin:Text,Dialogue,Humanities).Translated by BAI Chunren,Xiaohe,etc.,Shijiazhuang:Hebei Education Press,1998.]
[6]	——:《陀思妥耶夫斯基诗学问题》,白春仁、顾亚玲译。北京:三联书店,1988年。[——.Tuosituoyefusiji shixue wenti (Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics).Translated by BAI Chunren and GU Yaling.Beijing:Sanlian Bookstore,1988.]
[7]	——:《文艺学中的形式主义方法》,李辉凡、张捷译,桂林:漓江出版社,1989年。[——.Wenyixue zhong de xingshizhuyi fangfa (The Formalist Method in Literature and Art).Translated by LIHuifan and ZHANG Jie.Guilin:Lijiang Publishing House,1989.]
[8]	(德)恩格斯:《自然辩证法》,曹葆华、于光远、谢宁译,北京:人民出版社,1955年。[Engels,Friedrich.Ziran bianzhengfa (Dialectics of Nature).Translated by CAO Baohua,YU Guangyuan and XIE Ning.Beijing:People’s Publishing House,1955.]
[9]	——:《马克思恩格斯文集》,第1卷,北京:人民出版社,2009年。[——.Makesi Engesi wenji (Collected Works of Marx and Engels),vol.1.Beijing:People’s Publishing House,2009.]
[10]	(法)托多罗夫:《巴赫金、对话理论及其他》,蒋子华、张萍译,天津:百花文艺出版社,2001年。[Todorov.Bahejin,duihualilun ji qita (Bakhtin,Dialogism,and the Other).Translated by JIANG Zihua and ZHANG Ping.Tianjin:Baihua Literature and Art Publishing House,2001.]
[11]	夏忠宪:《巴赫金狂欢化诗学研究》,北京:北京师范大学出版社,2000年。[XIA Zhongxian.Bahejin kuanghuan shixue yanjiu (A Study of Bakhtin's Poetics of the Carnivalesque).Beijing:Beijing Normal University Press,2000.]
[12]	张开焱:《开放人格-巴赫金》,武汉:长江文艺出版社,2000年。[ZHANG Kaiyan.Kaifang renge:Bahejin (Open Personality:Bakhtin).Wuhan:Changjiang Literature and Art Publishing House,2000.]