Volume 6 Issue 4
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
FU Feixiong, CHEN Ling. A Qualitative Description of Recorded Demonstration Narrative, and Narrative Frameworks and Narrative Subjects of Demonstration Narrative: A Conversation with Mr. Zhao Yiheng[J]. International Comparative Literature, 2023, 6(4): 39-53. doi: 10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20236403
Citation: FU Feixiong, CHEN Ling. A Qualitative Description of Recorded Demonstration Narrative, and Narrative Frameworks and Narrative Subjects of Demonstration Narrative: A Conversation with Mr. Zhao Yiheng[J]. International Comparative Literature, 2023, 6(4): 39-53. doi: 10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20236403

A Qualitative Description of Recorded Demonstration Narrative, and Narrative Frameworks and Narrative Subjects of Demonstration Narrative: A Conversation with Mr. Zhao Yiheng

doi: 10.19857/j.cnki.ICL.20236403
  • Received Date: 2023-10-10
  • Accepted Date: 2023-11-21
  • Western film narratology has a tradition of categorizing the recorded demonstration narration(such as that in films, television, etc.) as demonstration narrative related to theatrical performance, rather than as recorded demonstration narrative or what combines certain characteristics of both. This understanding can be attributed to a failure to notice the limitation of Husserl's perception theory that it is unable to effectively distinguish illusion from perception. In fact, many basic characteristics of live narrative demonstration such as live theatre performance are absent in recorded demonstration narration; that the latter tends to proceed through the process of media recording cannot be ignored. Such negligence will result in the difficulty to accurately and effectively distinguish a myriad of narrative types. Undoubtedly, the recorded demonstration narrative has a dual nature, namely, it combines some characteristics of both on-site demonstration narrative and documentary storytelling. Furthermore, academic discussions on the separation framework and narrative subject of the demonstration narrative usually follow the theoretical framework of classical narratology, which is limited by a logocentric vision that hinders scholars engaged in discussion from completely returning to the genre itself. The creative mechanisms, fields of occurrence, symbolic media and existing forms of demonstration narrative are far more complex than those of the novel. The narrative framework of a demonstration narrative straddles two fields: one separates the inside from the outside of the narrated text, the other emulates the daily creation and living experience of the multitudinous narrative subjects to be found outside the narrated text but participate in the construction of the narrative——the demarcation itself is abstract. Meanwhile, the roles of the subnarrators such as the originator(or illocutionary source) and the performer are always relative and variable, and even some originators and performers are interchangeable. The performers fall into a category of narrators who directly tell the story with symbols such as body, posture, behavioral action, and so forth, while voice-overs are narrators in the sense of fictional narrative.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Bal M.Narratology:Introduction to the Theory of Narrative(3rd edition).Toronto:University of Toronto Press,1997.
    [2]
    Chatman,S.Coming to Terms:The Rhetoric of Narrative in Fiction and Film.Ithaca&London:Cornell University Press,1990.
    [3]
    Gaudreault,A.and Jost,F.Le récit cinématographique:film et séries télévisées(Film Narratology:Film and TVSeries).Paris:Armand Colin,2017.
    [4]
    Laffay,A.Logique du Cinéma:Création et Spectacle(The Logic of the movies:Creation and Performance).Paris:Mason,1964.
    [5]
    Lanser,S.S.Fictions of Authority:Women Writers and Narrative Voice.Ithaca and London:Cornell University,1992.
    [6]
    Marie-Laure Ryan.“Cyberage Narratology:Computer,Metaphor,and Narrative”,see David Herman ed.,Narratologies:New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis.Columbus:Ohio State University Press,1996,117.
    [7]
    Scholes,R.,Phelan,J.and Kellogg R.The Nature of Narrative(fortieth anniversary edition,Revised and expanded).New York:Oxford University Press,2006.
    [8]
    (法)布尔迪厄、华康德:《反思社会学导引》,李猛,李康译,商务印书馆,2005年。[Bourdieu,P.and Wacquant L.Fansi shehuixue daoyin(An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology).Translated by LIMeng and Li Kang.Beijing:The Commercial Press,2005.]
    [9]
    (德)胡塞尔:《逻辑研究》(第二卷第一部分),倪梁康译,北京:商务印书馆,2015年。[Husserl,E.Luoji yanjiu,dierjuan diyibufen(Logical Investigations),Volume 2,Part 1.Translated by NI Liangkang.Beijing:Commercial Press,2015.]
    [10]
    胡一伟:《论戏剧演出的三类伴随文本》,《四川戏剧》2018年第6期,第15-20页。[HU Yiwei.“Lun xiju yanchu de sanlei bansui wenben”(On the Three Types of Accompanying Texts in Dramatic Performance).Sichuan xiju(Sichuan Drama)6(2018):15

    ;20.]
    [11]
    刘云舟:《电影叙事学研究》,北京:北京联合出版公司,2014年。[LIU Yunzhou.Dianying xushixue yanjiu(Research on Film Narrative).Beijing:Beijing United Publishing Co.,Ltd.,2014.]
    [12]
    麦茨:《电影表意泛论》,崔君衍译,北京:商务印书馆,2018年。[Metz,C.Dianying biaoyi fanlun(A General Discussion on the Meaning of Movies).Translated by CUI Junyan.Beijing:The Commercial Press,2018.]
    [13]
    倪梁康:《胡塞尔现象学概念通释》,北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2007年。[NI Liangkang.Huseer xianxiangxue gainian tongshi(General Explanation of Husserl’s Phenomenological Concepts).Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company,2007.]
    [14]
    (美)浦安迪,Andrew H.:《中国叙事学》,北京:北京大学出版社,1996年。[Plaks Andrew H.Zhongguo xushixue[Chinese Narrative Studies].Beijing:Peking University Press,1996.]
    [15]
    (丹)萨哈维,D.《〈逻辑研究〉中的形而上学中立性》,段丽真译,见靳希平、王庆节等编:《中国现象学与哲学评论——现象学在中国:胡塞尔〈逻辑研究〉发表一百周年国际会议特辑》,上海:上海译文出版社,2003年,第161页。[Sahavi,D.“‘Luoji yanjiu’zhong de xingershangxue zhonglixing”(“Metaphysical Neutrality in Logical Investigations”).Translated by DUAN Lizhen.Edited by JIN Xiping,WANG Qingjie et al.In Chinese Phenomenology and Philosophical Review——Phenomenology in China:Special Edition of the International Conference on the 100th Anniversary of Husserl’s Logical Investigations.Shanghai:Shanghai Translation Publishing House,2003,161.]
    [16]
    苏永旭:《导演文本:戏剧叙事学研究不可忽略的重要的“中间转换形式”及其理论归宿》,《河南教育学院学报》(哲学社会科学版)1999年第2期,第8-10页。[SU Yongxu.“Daoyan wenben:xiju xushixue yanjiu buke hulue de zhongyao de‘zhongjianzhuanhuan xingshi’jiqi lilun guishu”(Director’s Text:An Important“Intermediate Transformation Form”and Its Theoretical Destination that cannot be Neglected in the Study of Dramatic Narrative).Henan jiaoyu xueyuan xuebao(Journal of Henan Institute of Education(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 2(1999):8

    -10.]
    [17]
    王志敏:“中译版序言:麦茨论”,见克里斯蒂安·麦茨:《想象的能指》,王志敏译,北京:中国广播电视出版社,2006年。[WANG Zhimin.“Zhongyiban xuyan:Maici lun”(Preface to the Chinese Translation:On Metz).Metz,C.Xiangxiang de nengzhi(Imaginary Signifier).Translated by WANG Zhimin.Bei jing:China Radio and Television Publishing House,2006.]
    [18]
    吴文科:《曲艺综论》,北京:北京时代华文书局,2015年。[WU Wenke.Quyi zonglun(Comprehensive Research on Quyi),Beijing:Beijing Times Chinese Bookstore,2015.]
    [19]
    (意)伊拉姆,Keir:《符号学与戏剧理论》,王坤译,台北:骆驼出版社,1998年。[Ilam,Keir.Fuhaoxue yu xiju lilun(The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama).Translated by WANG Kun.Taipei:Camel Publishing House,1998.]
    [20]
    袁国兴:《非文本中心叙事:京剧的“述演”研究》,广州:广东人民出版社,2013年。[YUAN Guoxing.Fei wenben zhongxing xushi:jingju de“shuyan”yanjiu(Non-Text Centered Narration:A Study of the“Narrative Performance”of Beijing Opera).Guangzhou:Guangdong People's Publishing House,2013.]
    [21]
    赵毅衡:《广义叙述学》,成都:四川大学出版社,2013年。[ZHAO Yiheng.Guangyi xushuxue(A Generalized Narratology).Chengdu:Sichuan University Press,2013.]
    [22]
    ——:《演示叙述:一个符号学分析》,《文学评论》2013年第1期,第139-144页。[——.“Yanshi xushu:yige fuhaoxue fenxi”(Demonstrating Narration:A Semiotic Analysis).Wenxue pinglun(Comments on Literature) 1(2013):139-44.]
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (13) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return