Roger T. AMES. Taking Confucian Religiousness On Its Own Terms[J]. International Comparative Literature, 2018, 1(1): 17-31.
Citation: Roger T. AMES. Taking Confucian Religiousness On Its Own Terms[J]. International Comparative Literature, 2018, 1(1): 17-31.

Taking Confucian Religiousness On Its Own Terms

  • Received Date: 2017-08-23
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-12-24
  • The distinguished French sinologist Marcel Granet observes rather starkly that "Chinese wisdom has no need of the idea of God." Albeit in different formulations, this same characterization of classical Chinese philosophy has had many iterations by many of our most prominent sinologists. One important outcome of taking Granet's insight into Chinese cosmology seriously is that it will enable us to disambiguate some of the central philosophical vocabulary of classical Chinese philosophy by identifying equivocations that emerge when we elide classical Greek ontological assumptions with those cosmological presuppositions indigenous to the classical Chinese worldview. The philosophical implications of Granet's seemingly off-hand observation that China did not need the idea of a transcendent God are fundamental and pervasive, entailing as this claim does the plethora of dualistic categories that follow from such a reality/appearance distinction. When we turn to Confucian religiousness, we find that it does not appeal to an independent, retrospective, and substantive Divine Agency as the reality behind appearance and as the source of all cosmic significance. The world is an autogenerative, "self-so-ing" process-ziran er ran 自然而然-that has the energy of self-transformation within it. And human religious feelings themselves are a motor of religious meaning, understood prospectively as an unfolding and inclusive spirituality achieved within the qualitatively inspired activities of the family, the community, and the natural world. Human beings are both a source of and contributors to the numinosity that inspires the world in which we live.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Ames, Roger T. "Death as Transformation in Classical Daoism," in Death and Philosophy:Reflections on Mortality. Edited by Jeff Malpas and Robert Solomon. London and New York:Routledge, 1998.
    ——. "Li礼and the A-theistic Religiousness of Classical Confucianism," in Confucian Spirituality. Edited by TU Wei-ming and Mary Evelyn Tucker. New York:Crossroad Press, 2003.
    ——. "War, Death and Ancient Chinese Cosmology:Thinking Through the Thickness of Culture," in Mortality in Ancient Chinese Thought. Edited by Amy L. Olberding and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Albany:State University of New York Press, 2011.
    Ames, Roger T., and David L. Hall. Focusing the Familiar:A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press, 2001.
    Berthrong, John. Concerning Creativity:A Comparison of Chu Hsi, Whitehead, and Neville. Albany:State University of New York Press, 1998.
    CHAN Wing-tsit. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1963.
    Dalmiya, Vrinda. "Linguistic Erasures." Peace Review, 10. 4(1998):523-8.
    Dennerline, Jerry. Qian Mu and the World of Seven Mansions. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1988.
    Dewey, John. Middle Works, 1899-1924, 15 vols. Edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale, IL:Southern Illinois University, 1976-83.
    ——. The Essential Dewey (Vol. 1). Edited by Larry Hickman and Thomas M. Alexander. Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press, 1998.
    Emerson, Ralph Waldo. The Spiritual Emerson:Basic Writings. Edited by David M. Robinson. Boston:Beacon Press, 2003.
    Fingarette, Herbert. Confucius:The Secular as Sacred. New York:Harper and Row, 1972.
    Granet, Marcel. La pensée chinoise. Paris:Editions Albin Michel, 1934.
    James, William. William James:The Essential Writings. Edited by Bruce W. Wilshire. Albany:State University of New York Press, 1984.
    Keightley, David N. "Early Civilization in China:Reflections on How it Became Chinese." In Heritage of China:Contemporary Perceptions on Chinese Civilization. Edited by Paul S. Ropp. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1990.
    Legge, James The Chinese Classics, 5 vols. Hong Kong:University of Hong Kong Press, 1960.
    ——. The Texts of Taoism. New York:Dover, 1962.
    Leuba, Henry. "The Contents of Religious Consciousness." The Monist, XI:1901.
    LIU Lydia H. Translingual Practice:Literature, National Culture, and Translated Modernity-China, 1900-1937. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1995.
    Puett, Michael. To Become a God:Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-Divinization in Early China. Cambridge:Harvard University Asia Center, 2002.
    Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1989.
    ——. Philosophy and Social Hope. New York:Penguin, 1999.
    Rorty, Richard, and Gianni Vattimo. The Future of Religion. New York:Columbia University Press, 2005.
    Rosemont, Henry Jr. Rationality and Religious Experience. La Salle, IL:Open Court, 2002.
    Steele, Dave Ramsey, ed. Genius in Their own Words. Chicago:Open Court, 2002.
    TU Wei-ming. Confucianism in historical perspective. Singapore:Institute of East Asian Philosophies, 1989.
    ——. Confucian Thought:Self as Creative Transformation. Albany:State University of New York Press, 1985.
    Vattimo, Gianni. After Christianity. New York:Columbia University Press, 2002.
    [WU Shuping. A Critical Edition of Understanding the Meaning of Popular Customs. Tianjin:Tianjin Peoples' Press, 1980.]
  • 加载中


    通讯作者: 陈斌,
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (598) PDF downloads(997) Cited by()
    Proportional views


    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint