以人为中心：论儒学的宗教感

安乐哲

以人为中心：论儒学的宗教感

安乐哲

北京大学/夏威夷大学

计量
- 文章访问数: 620
- HTML全文浏览量: 150
- PDF下载量: 1034
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-08-23
- 修回日期: 2017-12-24

Taking Confucian Religiousness On Its Own Terms

Roger T. AMES

Peking University/University of Hawaii

摘要

摘要: 著名汉学家葛兰言曾断言"中国智慧勿须上帝的观念"。尽管表述各异，但可知许多著名汉学家对此颇为赞同。以之来衡断中国的宇宙论，一个重要的后果便是，它会消除古典中国哲学核心词汇本来具有的某些模糊性蕴含，而使之变得齐整划一。中国勿须超越性上帝的观念，此说虽流传深远，但其实经不起仔细推敲——因为它所赖以成立的坚实基础是"实在/表象"之类的二元对立思维，因此不能适用于古代中国的世界观。儒家的宗教性不把独立、自省、实体性的"神圣作用者"作为表象之后的真实存在，也不把它视为宇宙意义的根源。儒家把世界视为自生自成、自然而然的过程——它自身便具有自我转型的能量。人类的宗教情感就是宗教意义的发动者，它广泛地、内在地展现于家庭、社区和自然世界的各种活动之中，激发出富有生机的精神力量。人类既是鼓舞人生世界之神圣价值的源泉，同时也是神圣价值的奉献者本身。
- 宇宙论 /
- 本体论 /
- 超越性 /
- 自然 /
- 人类中心的宗教性 /
- 上帝中心的宗教
Abstract: The distinguished French sinologist Marcel Granet observes rather starkly that "Chinese wisdom has no need of the idea of God." Albeit in different formulations, this same characterization of classical Chinese philosophy has had many iterations by many of our most prominent sinologists. One important outcome of taking Granet's insight into Chinese cosmology seriously is that it will enable us to disambiguate some of the central philosophical vocabulary of classical Chinese philosophy by identifying equivocations that emerge when we elide classical Greek ontological assumptions with those cosmological presuppositions indigenous to the classical Chinese worldview. The philosophical implications of Granet's seemingly off-hand observation that China did not need the idea of a transcendent God are fundamental and pervasive, entailing as this claim does the plethora of dualistic categories that follow from such a reality/appearance distinction. When we turn to Confucian religiousness, we find that it does not appeal to an independent, retrospective, and substantive Divine Agency as the reality behind appearance and as the source of all cosmic significance. The world is an autogenerative, "self-so-ing" process-ziran er ran 自然而然-that has the energy of self-transformation within it. And human religious feelings themselves are a motor of religious meaning, understood prospectively as an unfolding and inclusive spirituality achieved within the qualitatively inspired activities of the family, the community, and the natural world. Human beings are both a source of and contributors to the numinosity that inspires the world in which we live.
- cosmology /
- ontology /
- transcendence /
- ziran /
- human-centered religiousness /
- God-centered religion

HTML全文

参考文献(30)

[1]	Ames, Roger T. "Death as Transformation in Classical Daoism," in Death and Philosophy:Reflections on Mortality. Edited by Jeff Malpas and Robert Solomon. London and New York:Routledge, 1998.
[2]	——. "Li礼and the A-theistic Religiousness of Classical Confucianism," in Confucian Spirituality. Edited by TU Wei-ming and Mary Evelyn Tucker. New York:Crossroad Press, 2003.
[3]	——. "War, Death and Ancient Chinese Cosmology:Thinking Through the Thickness of Culture," in Mortality in Ancient Chinese Thought. Edited by Amy L. Olberding and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Albany:State University of New York Press, 2011.
[4]	Ames, Roger T., and David L. Hall. Focusing the Familiar:A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press, 2001.
[5]	Berthrong, John. Concerning Creativity:A Comparison of Chu Hsi, Whitehead, and Neville. Albany:State University of New York Press, 1998.
[6]	CHAN Wing-tsit. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1963.
[7]	Dalmiya, Vrinda. "Linguistic Erasures." Peace Review, 10. 4(1998):523-8.
[8]	Dennerline, Jerry. Qian Mu and the World of Seven Mansions. New Haven:Yale University Press, 1988.
[9]	Dewey, John. Middle Works, 1899-1924, 15 vols. Edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale, IL:Southern Illinois University, 1976-83.
[10]	——. The Essential Dewey (Vol. 1). Edited by Larry Hickman and Thomas M. Alexander. Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press, 1998.
[11]	Emerson, Ralph Waldo. The Spiritual Emerson:Basic Writings. Edited by David M. Robinson. Boston:Beacon Press, 2003.
[12]	Fingarette, Herbert. Confucius:The Secular as Sacred. New York:Harper and Row, 1972.
[13]	Granet, Marcel. La pensée chinoise. Paris:Editions Albin Michel, 1934.
[14]	James, William. William James:The Essential Writings. Edited by Bruce W. Wilshire. Albany:State University of New York Press, 1984.
[15]	Keightley, David N. "Early Civilization in China:Reflections on How it Became Chinese." In Heritage of China:Contemporary Perceptions on Chinese Civilization. Edited by Paul S. Ropp. Berkeley:University of California Press, 1990.
[16]	Legge, James The Chinese Classics, 5 vols. Hong Kong:University of Hong Kong Press, 1960.
[17]	——. The Texts of Taoism. New York:Dover, 1962.
[18]	Leuba, Henry. "The Contents of Religious Consciousness." The Monist, XI:1901.
[19]	LIU Lydia H. Translingual Practice:Literature, National Culture, and Translated Modernity-China, 1900-1937. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1995.
[20]	Puett, Michael. To Become a God:Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-Divinization in Early China. Cambridge:Harvard University Asia Center, 2002.
[21]	Rorty, Richard. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[22]	——. Philosophy and Social Hope. New York:Penguin, 1999.
[23]	Rorty, Richard, and Gianni Vattimo. The Future of Religion. New York:Columbia University Press, 2005.
[24]	Rosemont, Henry Jr. Rationality and Religious Experience. La Salle, IL:Open Court, 2002.
[25]	Steele, Dave Ramsey, ed. Genius in Their own Words. Chicago:Open Court, 2002.
[26]	TU Wei-ming. Confucianism in historical perspective. Singapore:Institute of East Asian Philosophies, 1989.
[27]	——. Confucian Thought:Self as Creative Transformation. Albany:State University of New York Press, 1985.
[28]	Vattimo, Gianni. After Christianity. New York:Columbia University Press, 2002.
[29]	吴树平:《风俗通义校释》,天津:天津人民出版社,1980年。
[30]	[WU Shuping. A Critical Edition of Understanding the Meaning of Popular Customs. Tianjin:Tianjin Peoples' Press, 1980.]